PRAC recommendations on signals adopted at the  6-9 July 2026 PRAC meeting

The Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) of the European Medicines Agency met on 6–9 July 2026 and adopted important recommendations for multiple safety signals. This article provides a comprehensive medical analysis of the signals reviewed, including product information updates for desogestrel/etonogestrel and meningioma, levonorgestrel intrauterine systems and ectopic pregnancy, and recommendations for supplementary information concerning atogepant and insomnia, CGRP antagonists and Raynaud’s phenomenon, oseltamivir safety in critically ill patients, sacituzumab govitecan and interstitial lung disease, selpercatinib and intestinal lymphangiectasia, and sevoflurane and acute encephalopathy in patients carrying the mitochondrial DNA variant m.11232T>C. For each signal, we explore the clinical presentation, pathophysiology, epidemiological evidence, regulatory actions, and practical implications for healthcare professionals, drawing on published literature and regulatory documents.


1. Introduction: The Role of PRAC in Medication Safety

The Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) is the European Medicines Agency’s committee responsible for evaluating safety signals for human medicines. At its meeting of 6–9 July 2026, PRAC adopted important recommendations for multiple safety signals, ranging from product information updates to requests for supplementary information and Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs).


2. Signal 1: Desogestrel and Etonogestrel – Risk of Meningioma

Signal EPITT No: 20167
PRAC Rapporteur: Karin Bolin (SE)
Action: Product information update; DHPC distribution

2.1 Background

Desogestrel and etonogestrel are progestogens used for contraception. Desogestrel-containing medicines are available as oral tablets, while etonogestrel-containing medicines are available as implants or, in combination with ethinylestradiol, as vaginal rings. Desogestrel is metabolised to etonogestrel, which is the active metabolite.

2.2 The Signal: Meningioma

PRAC identified a signal for meningioma associated with current, prolonged use (>1 year) of desogestrel- or etonogestrel-containing contraceptives.

2.2.1 What is Meningioma?

Meningiomas are tumours of the tissue layer (meninges) surrounding the brain and spinal cord. Key characteristics include:

FeatureDescription
IncidenceMost common primary intracranial tumour in adults, making up nearly 40% of primary central nervous system tumours
Sex ratioOccur two to three times more frequently in women than men
Progesterone receptor expressionFound in up to 87% of meningiomas
Clinical presentationUsually benign (non-cancerous) and grow slowly but, depending on size or location, can cause serious problems
SymptomsChanges in vision, hearing loss or ringing in the ears, loss of smell, worsening headaches, memory loss, seizures, or weakness in arms and legs

2.2.2 Epidemiological Evidence

The PRAC recommendations were based on a large French case-control study conducted using the Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS). The study included 8,391 women who had undergone intracranial surgery for meningioma, compared to 83,910 controls.

ParameterFinding
Odds ratio (OR) for desogestrel 75 μg, use ≥1 year1.3 (95% CI: 1.1–1.5)
Number needed to harm (NNH)67,300 women for one additional intracranial meningioma
OR with ≥7 years of use2.1 (95% CI: 1.5–2.9)
OR in women with prior high-risk progestogen exposure3.3 (95% CI: 2.6–4.1)
Risk after discontinuationNo longer observed one year after stopping desogestrel

Additional studies corroborate these findings. A Danish nested case-control study of 1,473 women with meningioma matched with 14,717 controls found:

  • Desogestrel in combined oral contraceptives: OR 1.66 (95% CI: 1.31–2.10)
  • Desogestrel as progestogen-only pill: OR 1.73 (95% CI: 1.17–2.56)
  • Injectable medroxyprogesterone: OR 4.55 (95% CI: 2.19–9.45) – highest risk

Progestogens previously associated with meningioma that increase risk in combination with desogestrel/etonogestrel include cyproterone, nomegestrol, medroxyprogesterone, and chlormadinone.

2.3 Regulatory Action

PRAC recommended the following changes:

Contraindications (SmPC Section 4.3):

  • Meningioma or history of meningioma

Warnings (SmPC Section 4.4):

  • Current, prolonged use (≥1 year) associated with small increased risk
  • Risk increases with longer duration
  • Risk may be higher with previous progestogen exposure
  • Monitor for signs and symptoms of meningioma
  • If diagnosed with meningioma, treatment must be discontinued

Undesirable effects (SmPC Section 4.8):

  • Meningioma added with frequency “not known”

DHPC: A Direct Healthcare Professional Communication was agreed to inform healthcare professionals of the small increased risk.

2.4 Clinical Implications

ImplicationAction
Pre-prescribing assessmentConsider history of meningioma or previous exposure to high-risk progestogens
ContraindicationDo not prescribe desogestrel/etonogestrel to women with current or past meningioma
MonitoringEducate patients on signs and symptoms: vision changes, hearing loss/tinnitus, loss of smell, worsening headaches, memory loss, seizures, limb weakness
Management of diagnosed meningiomaDiscontinue the medicine immediately
Risk communicationCounsel that absolute risk remains very low (NNH 67,300) but informed consent is essential

A 2025 study in the BMJ suggested that desogestrel should be discontinued if an intracranial meningioma is identified, with patients monitored clinically and radiologically rather than undergoing immediate surgery.


3. Signal 2: Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device 13.5 mg (Jaydess) – Increased Risk of Ectopic Pregnancy

Signal EPITT No: 20251
PRAC Rapporteur: Dennis Lex (DE)
Action: Product information update

3.1 Background

Jaydess is a low-dose levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) containing 13.5 mg of levonorgestrel. It is indicated for contraception and is not first choice for nulliparous women due to limited clinical experience.

3.2 The Signal: Ectopic Pregnancy

PRAC identified an increased risk of ectopic pregnancy with the levonorgestrel 13.5 mg IUS compared to other IUSs and copper IUDs, based on a nationwide cohort study using data from the French National Healthcare Data System.

3.2.1 What is Ectopic Pregnancy?

Ectopic pregnancy is a pregnancy that develops outside the uterine cavity, most commonly in the fallopian tube. It is a serious, potentially life-threatening condition requiring immediate medical attention.

Risk factors:

  • Previous ectopic pregnancy
  • Tubal surgery
  • Pelvic infection

3.2.2 Epidemiological Evidence

A nationwide cohort study compared hormonal IUSs and copper IUDs. At 1 year, ectopic pregnancy incidence rates per 100 woman-years were:

DeviceIncidence Rate (95% CI)Hazard Ratio vs Copper IUD (95% CI)
Levonorgestrel 13.5 mg IUS (Jaydess)0.182.57 (1.92–3.43)
Levonorgestrel 19.5 mg IUS0.101.37 (1.15–1.62)
Levonorgestrel 52 mg IUSNot specified0.62 (0.49–0.80)
Copper IUDsReference1.00 (reference)

In clinical trials, the overall incidence of ectopic pregnancy with Jaydess was approximately 0.11 per 100 woman-years, with approximately half of pregnancies that occur during Jaydess use being ectopic.

3.3 Regulatory Action

PRAC recommended updating the product information to reflect the higher incidence rates of ectopic pregnancy with Jaydess (13.5 mg) compared to other IUSs and copper IUDs. Key additions include:

  • Women considering Jaydess should be counselled on signs, symptoms, and risks of ectopic pregnancy
  • For women who become pregnant while using Jaydess, possibility of ectopic pregnancy must be considered and evaluated
  • Because an ectopic pregnancy may compromise future fertility, benefits and risks should be carefully evaluated, particularly for nulliparous women

3.4 Clinical Implications

ImplicationAction
Pre-insertion counsellingDiscuss increased relative risk of ectopic pregnancy with Jaydess vs other IUSs/IUDs; particularly important for nulliparous women
Risk factor assessmentEvaluate history of ectopic pregnancy, tubal surgery, or pelvic infection
Symptom awarenessLower abdominal pain, especially with missed periods or bleeding in amenorrheic women, should prompt ectopic pregnancy evaluation
Emergency preparednessEctopic pregnancy is a serious condition requiring immediate medical attention

4. Signal 3: Atogepant – Insomnia

Signal EPITT No: 20291
PRAC Rapporteur: Rugile Pilviniene (LT)
Action: Assess in ongoing PSUR (submission by 30 September 2026)

4.1 Background

Atogepant is a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist (gepant) indicated for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults. It is available as 10 mg and 60 mg tablets.

4.2 The Signal: Insomnia

PRAC identified a signal for insomnia associated with atogepant.

4.2.1 Clinical Context

CGRP and its receptors are involved in various physiological processes beyond migraine pathophysiology, including sleep regulation. Emerging data suggest that anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants, particularly erenumab, galcanezumab, and atogepant, can improve subjective sleep quality in some cases, but sleep-related adverse events have also been reported.

4.2.2 Evidence

A pharmacovigilance analysis found:

  • Insomnia was reported in less than 1% of cases for rimegepant, atogepant, and ubrogepant
  • Abnormal dreams and nightmares were particularly noted with atogepant, with FAERS analyses showing a robust signal (ROR 7.74)
  • Most commonly reported adverse drug reactions with atogepant are nausea (9%), constipation (8%), and fatigue/somnolence (5%)

4.3 Regulatory Action

PRAC requested the MAH (AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG) to assess the insomnia signal in the ongoing Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) with submission by 30 September 2026.

4.4 Clinical Implications

ImplicationAction
Patient counsellingInform patients about potential sleep-related adverse effects, including insomnia, abnormal dreams, and nightmares
MonitoringAssess sleep quality during atogepant treatment
ReportingReport any suspected cases of insomnia or sleep disturbances to national pharmacovigilance centres

5. Signal 4: CGRP Antagonists – Raynaud’s Phenomenon

Signal EPITT No: 20292
PRAC Rapporteur: Terhi Lehtinen (FI)
Action: Supplementary information requested (submission by 14 October 2026)

5.1 Background

This signal covers multiple CGRP-targeting therapies:

  • Gepants (small molecules): Atogepant, rimegepant
  • CGRP monoclonal antibodies: Eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab

5.2 The Signal: Raynaud’s Phenomenon

PRAC identified a signal for Raynaud’s phenomenon associated with CGRP antagonists.

5.2.1 What is Raynaud’s Phenomenon?

Raynaud’s phenomenon is a vasospastic disorder causing episodes of reduced blood flow to the extremities, typically the fingers and toes.

Features:

  • Fingers or toes become numb, cool, or painful
  • Colour changes from pale to blue to red
  • Symptoms typically occur after a median of 71 days following dosing with CGRP monoclonal antibodies

5.2.2 Pathophysiological Mechanism

CGRP is a potent vasodilator. By blocking CGRP or its receptor, CGRP antagonists may:

  • Reduce compensatory vasodilation in response to cold or stress
  • Exacerbate underlying vasospastic tendencies
  • Unmask or worsen pre-existing Raynaud’s phenomenon

A 2026 disproportionality study investigating the potential risk and possible mechanisms of Raynaud’s phenomenon associated with CGRP antagonists found that erenumab had the highest number of reports, while fremanezumab resulted in the strongest AE signals.

5.2.3 Clinical Evidence

  • In March 2025, FDA labelling for gepants was updated to include potential risks of hypertension and Raynaud’s phenomenon
  • The CGRP mAb erenumab label also warns of new-onset or worsening hypertension
  • Raynaud’s phenomenon has been reported in 5.3% of cases with microvascular complications (5 cases erenumab, 3 galcanezumab, 1 fremanezumab)
  • Contraindicated if severe Raynaud’s with microvascular lesions and/or sclerodermia

5.3 Regulatory Action

PRAC requested supplementary information from all MAHs by 14 October 2026, including:

  • Cumulative case review (spontaneous reports, literature, clinical trials)
  • Detailed case-by-case evaluation (causality, risk factors, outcomes)
  • Analysis of incidence rates (exposure-adjusted)
  • Proposed updates to product information if warranted

5.4 Clinical Implications

ImplicationAction
Pre-existing Raynaud’sMonitor patients with a history of Raynaud’s phenomenon for worsening or recurrence
New-onset symptomsAdvise patients to report numbness, coolness, pain, or colour changes in fingers or toes
MonitoringDiscontinue therapy if signs or symptoms of Raynaud’s phenomenon develop
ContraindicationsExercise caution or consider alternative therapy in patients with severe Raynaud’s with microvascular lesions or sclerodermia
ReportingReport any suspected cases to national pharmacovigilance centres

6. Signal 5: Oseltamivir and Intravenous Zanamivir – New Information on Safety in Critically Ill Patients with Influenza

Signal EPITT No: 20299
PRAC Rapporteur: Terhi Lehtinen (FI)
Action: Supplementary information requested (submission by 26 August 2026)

6.1 Background

Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) is a neuraminidase inhibitor that is the current first-line antiviral treatment for influenza in critically ill patients. Zanamivir is another neuraminidase inhibitor available in intravenous formulation.

6.2 The Signal: Safety in Critically Ill Patients

PRAC identified a signal concerning the safety and efficacy of oseltamivir in critically ill patients with influenza, triggered by preliminary results from the REMAP-CAP trial.

6.2.1 The REMAP-CAP Trial

On 10 June 2026, the REMAP-CAP trial released preliminary results suggesting that oseltamivir:

  • Is not effective in adult patients with influenza in critical care
  • May be harmful

The analysis indicated:

  • <2% chance oseltamivir was effective
  • 98% chance it was harmful in this population

Subsequent guidelines, including the Australian Therapeutic Guidelines, have recommended against routinely using oseltamivir in critically ill patients aged 12 and older.

6.3 Clinical Significance

This signal is particularly significant because:

  • Critically ill influenza patients represent a high-risk population
  • Oseltamivir has been standard of care in ICU settings
  • Potential harm must be balanced against the risk of untreated influenza

6.4 Regulatory Action

PRAC requested supplementary information from the MAHs (Roche Registration GmbH, GlaxoSmithKline Trading Services Limited) by 26 August 2026, including:

  • Updated analysis of efficacy and safety data in critically ill patients
  • Assessment of risk-benefit balance in this population
  • Proposed updates to product information if warranted

6.5 Clinical Implications

ImplicationAction
Re-evaluate standard practiceCritically ill influenza patients may not benefit from oseltamivir; potential harm must be considered
Individualised decision-makingConsider patient-specific factors; alternative antivirals (baloxavir, peramivir) may be options
Monitor closelyFor adverse effects in critically ill patients receiving oseltamivir
ReportingReport any suspected adverse reactions in critically ill patients

7. Signal 6: Sacituzumab Govitecan – Interstitial Lung Disease

Signal EPITT No: 20290
PRAC Rapporteur: Bianca Mulder (NL)
Action: Supplementary information requested (submission by 23 September 2026)

7.1 Background

Sacituzumab govitecan is a new-generation antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) indicated for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and other solid tumours. It consists of a monoclonal antibody targeting Trop-2 linked to the active metabolite of irinotecan (SN-38).

7.2 The Signal: Interstitial Lung Disease

PRAC identified a signal for interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with sacituzumab govitecan.

7.2.1 What is Drug-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease?

Drug-induced ILD is a spectrum of pulmonary disorders characterised by inflammation and fibrosis of the lung interstitium. In the context of ADCs, ILD is a known class effect.

Mechanism: Drug-induced ILD may occur through:

  • Direct cytotoxicity to pneumocytes
  • Immune-mediated inflammation
  • Off-target effects of the payload or linker

7.2.2 Clinical Evidence

A 2026 case report described interstitial pneumonitis related to sacituzumab govitecan in a patient with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Key points:

  • Sacituzumab-govitecan-related pulmonary toxicity is rare
  • Early detection of drug-induced interstitial lung disease is critical
  • Management requires drug discontinuation and immediate steroid therapy
  • Interestingly, the patient was successfully rechallenged with a reduced dose without recurrent pneumonitis

7.3 Regulatory Action

PRAC requested supplementary information from the MAH (Gilead Sciences Ireland UC) by 23 September 2026.

7.4 Clinical Implications

ImplicationAction
AwarenessMaintain high index of suspicion for ILD in patients on sacituzumab govitecan presenting with respiratory symptoms
MonitoringRegular pulmonary assessment; consider baseline and interval pulmonary function tests
Early detectionPrompt evaluation of new or worsening cough, dyspnoea, or hypoxia
ManagementDiscontinue sacituzumab govitecan if ILD suspected; initiate corticosteroids
RechallengeMay be possible at reduced dose in selected patients
ReportingReport any suspected cases to national pharmacovigilance centres

8. Signal 7: Selpercatinib – Intestinal Lymphangiectasia

Signal EPITT No: 20289
PRAC Rapporteur: Bianca Mulder (NL)
Action: Assess in next PSUR (submission by 17 January 2027)

8.1 Background

Selpercatinib is a selective RET (rearranged during transfection) inhibitor indicated for RET fusion-positive lung cancers and other RET-altered solid tumours.

8.2 The Signal: Intestinal Lymphangiectasia

PRAC identified a signal for intestinal lymphangiectasia associated with selpercatinib.

8.2.1 What is Intestinal Lymphangiectasia?

Intestinal lymphangiectasia is a disorder characterised by:

  • Dilated intestinal lacteals (lymphatic vessels in the intestinal villi)
  • Potential lymph leakage into the intestinal lumen
  • Resulting in protein-losing enteropathy, hypoalbuminaemia, lymphopenia, and oedema

A 2026 systematic analysis described this as “an underrecognised disorder”.

8.2.2 Clinical Evidence

A 2026 report titled “Brief Report: Intestinal Lymphangiectasia With Selpercatinib and Pralsetinib Treatment” identified drug-induced intestinal lymphangiectasia as an emerging complication.

Key findings:

  • Drug-induced IL occurs with selpercatinib or pralsetinib treatment
  • First systematic analysis of IL in RET inhibitor-treated patients
  • Mechanism likely related to RET inhibition affecting lymphatic development and function

8.3 Regulatory Action

PRAC requested the MAH (Eli Lilly Nederland B.V.) to assess the signal in the next PSUR with submission by 17 January 2027.

8.4 Clinical Implications

ImplicationAction
AwarenessConsider intestinal lymphangiectasia in patients on selpercatinib presenting with oedema, hypoalbuminaemia, or lymphopenia
Diagnostic evaluationEndoscopy with biopsy may show dilated lacteals; further investigations may include faecal alpha-1 antitrypsin clearance
ManagementMay require dietary modification (low-fat diet, medium-chain triglycerides), albumin supplementation, or treatment adjustment
ReportingReport any suspected cases to national pharmacovigilance centres

9. Signal 8: Sevoflurane – Acute Encephalopathy in Patients Carrying the Mitochondrial DNA Variant m.11232T>C

Signal EPITT No: 20285
PRAC Rapporteur: Eamon O Murchu (IE)
Action: Supplementary information requested (submission by 23 September 2026)

9.1 Background

Sevoflurane is a volatile halogenated anaesthetic agent widely used for induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia.

9.2 The Signal: Acute Encephalopathy

PRAC identified a signal for acute encephalopathy in patients carrying the mitochondrial DNA variant m.11232T>C following sevoflurane exposure.

9.2.1 The Mitochondrial DNA Variant

The m.11232T>C variant is located in the MT-ND4 gene, which encodes a subunit of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I (NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase). This variant has been identified in patients of Venezuelan ancestry.

9.2.2 Pathophysiology

In vitro studies have shown that:

  • Sevoflurane exposure in cells carrying the m.11232T>C genetic variant induces a pronounced suppression of mitochondrial oxygen consumption
  • This leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and impaired cellular energy production
  • Neural tissue is particularly vulnerable due to its high energy demands

9.2.3 Clinical Evidence

A 2026 case report described a 20-year-old woman who developed acute encephalopathy after uneventful general anaesthesia with sevoflurane. Genetic testing confirmed the mitochondrial variant m.11232T>C in the MT-ND4 gene, previously described only in paediatric patients.

A Spanish alert (GTSAD-SEMICYUC) identified susceptibility to the MT-ND4 mitochondrial variant with the use of halogenated gases for ICU sedation.

Key findings:

  • Patients sharing a mitochondrial DNA haplotype that includes the m.11232T>C variant may be at increased risk of severe neurologic deterioration after sevoflurane exposure
  • Adult and paediatric patients of Venezuelan ancestry may carry this mitochondrial gene mutation
  • Anaesthesia professionals are encouraged to avoid sevoflurane and other volatile anaesthetic agents in susceptible patients

9.3 Regulatory Action

PRAC requested supplementary information from the MAHs (AbbVie SA, Baxter SA, Piramal Critical Care B.V.) by 23 September 2026.

9.4 Clinical Implications

ImplicationAction
Risk identificationConsider patient ancestry (Venezuelan origin) as a risk factor
Pre-anaesthetic assessmentAsk about family history of anaesthetic complications
Alternative agentsConsider avoiding sevoflurane and other volatile anaesthetics in at-risk patients; use midazolam or other agents
MonitoringIf volatile anaesthetics are used, monitor closely for signs of encephalopathy
ReportingReport any suspected cases of acute encephalopathy following sevoflurane exposure

10. Additional Actions: Venlafaxine Cardiotoxicity

Signal EPITT No: 20230
PRAC Rapporteur: Karin Bolin (SE)
Action: Monitor in PSUR

Venlafaxine is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) antidepressant. PRAC recommended monitoring the signal of cardiotoxicity in PSURs. Healthcare professionals should maintain vigilance for cardiovascular adverse effects in patients on venlafaxine.


11. Summary of PRAC Actions

DrugSignalPRAC ActionClinical SeverityExpected Outcome
Desogestrel/EtonogestrelMeningiomaProduct information update; DHPCModerate (rare but serious)SmPC/PIL update; contraindication; DHPC
Levonorgestrel 13.5 mg IUSEctopic pregnancyProduct information updateHigh (potentially life-threatening)SmPC/PIL update
AtogepantInsomniaAssess in PSURMild-moderatePossible future product information update
CGRP antagonistsRaynaud’s phenomenonSupplementary informationModeratePossible product information update
OseltamivirSafety in critical illnessSupplementary informationHighPossible practice-changing
Sacituzumab govitecanInterstitial lung diseaseSupplementary informationHighPossible product information update
SelpercatinibIntestinal lymphangiectasiaAssess in PSURModeratePossible product information update
SevofluraneAcute encephalopathy (mitochondrial variant)Supplementary informationHigh (life-threatening)Possible product information update

12. Practical Guidance for Healthcare Professionals

12.1 Recognizing and Reporting Adverse Reactions

SignalRed FlagsDiagnostic StepsManagement
Meningioma (desogestrel/etonogestrel)Vision changes, hearing loss/tinnitus, loss of smell, worsening headaches, memory loss, seizures, limb weaknessNeurological examination; MRI brain; ophthalmology assessmentDiscontinue contraceptive; monitor clinically and radiologically; surgery if indicated
Ectopic pregnancy (LNG-IUS)Lower abdominal pain, missed periods, bleeding in amenorrheic womenβ-hCG; transvaginal ultrasoundUrgent surgical or medical management
Raynaud’s phenomenon (CGRP antagonists)Numbness, coolness, pain, colour changes in fingers/toesClinical examination; monitor for worseningConsider discontinuation
Interstitial lung disease (sacituzumab govitecan)Cough, dyspnoea, hypoxiaChest imaging (HRCT); pulmonary function testsDiscontinue; corticosteroids
Acute encephalopathy (sevoflurane + mitochondrial variant)Altered consciousness, neurological deterioration post-anaesthesiaGenetic testing for m.11232T>C; neurological assessmentAvoid volatile anaesthetics in future; supportive care

12.2 The Importance of Reporting

Each of these signals was identified because healthcare professionals and manufacturers reported suspected adverse reactions. Healthcare professionals play a vital role in:

  • Recognising potential adverse reactions
  • Documenting cases thoroughly
  • Reporting to national pharmacovigilance centres
  • Contributing to the global knowledge base

13. Conclusion

The July 2026 PRAC recommendations highlight the dynamic nature of pharmacovigilance and the ongoing need for post-marketing safety surveillance. The eight signals discussed in this article demonstrate the diverse ways in which adverse reactions can manifest:

  • Hormonal contraceptives – Meningioma risk with desogestrel/etonogestrel (NNH 67,300) and increased ectopic pregnancy risk with low-dose LNG-IUS
  • Migraine therapies – Insomnia with atogepant and Raynaud’s phenomenon with CGRP antagonists
  • Infectious disease treatments – Potential harm with oseltamivir in critically ill influenza patients
  • Oncological therapies – Interstitial lung disease with sacituzumab govitecan and intestinal lymphangiectasia with selpercatinib
  • Anaesthetic agents – Acute encephalopathy with sevoflurane in patients with mitochondrial DNA variant m.11232T>C

For healthcare professionals, these updates serve as important reminders to:

  • Maintain clinical vigilance for emerging safety signals
  • Consider drug-induced aetiologies in differential diagnosis
  • Document and report suspected adverse reactions
  • Stay informed through regulatory communications

Each report contributes to the global understanding of drug safety and may help identify signals that protect future patients.


References

  1. European Medicines Agency. Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC). PRAC recommendations on signals adopted at the 6-9 July 2026 PRAC meeting. EMA/PRAC/155652/2026. 3 August 2026.
  2. European Medicines Agency. Meeting highlights from the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) 6-9 July 2026. 10 July 2026.
  3. Roland N, Kolla E, Baricault B, et al. Oral contraceptives with progestogens desogestrel or levonorgestrel and risk of intracranial meningioma: national case-control study. BMJ. 2025;389:e083981.
  4. Hasselblad Lundstrøm N, et al. Contraceptive Progestogens and Incident Meningioma. JAMA Netw Open. 2026;9(7):e2622603.
  5. Sanz-Pons J, et al. Effects of a Mitochondrial Genetic Variant on Sevoflurane Hypersensitivity. Anesthesiology. 2026;144(6).
  6. Brief Report: Intestinal Lymphangiectasia With Selpercatinib and Pralsetinib Treatment. J Thorac Oncol. 2026 Mar 31:103704.
  7. Interstitial pneumonitis related to sacituzumab govitecan in a patient with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2026;20:103.
  8. REMAP-CAP trial preliminary results: Oseltamivir in critically ill patients with influenza. 10 June 2026.
  9. Progestogen use and the risk of intracranial meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2026 Feb;92:103791.
  10. Meningioma in users of progestogen contraceptives: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025.

AlVigiLance

Advancing Medication Safety Through Knowledge and Vigilance

Recently Posted

Category

Advancing Medication Safety Through Knowledge and Vigilance

2025 © AlVigiLance

Powered by SiraLance